Lactobacillus

Lactobacillus: the yogurt bacterium that barely lives in your gut

Lactobacillus is a genus of lactic-acid-producing bacteria found in fermented foods, the mouth, the vagina and, in small numbers, the gut. Probiotic trials show it helps prevent antibiotic diarrhea; one large trial found no benefit for stomach flu. In 2020 genome data split the old genus into 25 genera, so many familiar names changed.

Genus
Lactobacillus
Syn.
Lactobacillus sensu lato (pre-2020, 261 species), lactobacilli
NCBI
txid1578
Wikidata
Q1061596

Ask most people what Lactobacillus is and they will say "the good bacteria in yogurt." That is true, and it is also the least interesting thing about it. The fuller picture: a family of lactic-acid-making bacteria that lives mostly on plants and in fermented food, holds a few very specific corners of the human body, and does very different things depending on which corner you look at.

What it is

Lactobacillus is a genus of Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria that do not form spores and make their living by fermenting sugars into lactic acid 1. That acid is the whole story of the genus. It sours milk into yogurt and cabbage into sauerkraut, and it lowers the pH of any place where these bacteria gather in enough numbers to matter. Every advantage and every disadvantage below comes back to that one chemical habit.

Where it lives in the body

Here is the first surprise. The genus we associate with "gut health" is a minor tenant of the human gut. In Jens Walter's 2008 review in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, lactobacilli are cultured from stool at an average of about 10⁶ cells per gram — roughly 0.01 % of the total count — and are not detectable at all in around 25 % of human stool samples 2. In the stomach and small intestine they sit below 10⁴ per millilitre, and most of those are passing through from the mouth or from food rather than settling in 2. A 2016 metagenomic study by Rossi and colleagues followed one healthy adult for almost 2 years and did find a small, persistent community — 58 species detected across three stool samples, and 43 strains present either in all three or in two samples taken 670 or 700 days apart — so "minor" does not mean "absent" 10. The honest summary: a few real residents, a lot of tourists.

The vagina is the opposite case. In Ravel and colleagues' 2011 survey of 396 asymptomatic North American women, the bacterial communities sorted into five types, and four of them were each dominated by a single Lactobacillus species — L. iners, L. crispatus, L. gasseri or L. jensenii 3. Average vaginal pH ran from 4.2 to 5.0 across the four ethnic groups studied 3. That acidity is Lactobacillus at work, and it is the environment most vaginal pathogens struggle in.

The mouth is the third address, and the least flattering. Caufield's 2015 review in the Journal of Dental Research argues that lactobacilli are opportunistic settlers that need three things — a stagnant, low-oxygen pocket, a low pH, and steady sugar — and that only three sites in the body reliably provide all of them: caries lesions, the stomach and the vagina 4. In the mouth that means lactobacilli are found inside cavities and are largely missing from caries-free children 4.

The 2020 split: one genus became 25

By March 2020 the genus held 261 species 1, so diverse in genome and lifestyle that lumping them together had stopped meaning anything. Zheng and colleagues reclassified the group using whole-genome comparisons into 25 genera: an emended, narrower Lactobacillus plus 23 newly named genera 1. The species that kept the name are the host-adapted ones — L. acidophilus, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. jensenii, L. iners and L. delbrueckii, the yogurt organism. Familiar probiotic names moved: L. rhamnosus became Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, L. casei became Lacticaseibacillus casei, L. plantarum became Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, L. reuteri became Limosilactobacillus reuteri 1. The authors kept the everyday word "lactobacilli" for everything that was called Lactobacillus before 2020 1, so labels and papers from before the split are not wrong — just older. On this site the new name comes first and the old one is given as a synonym.

What it does for us

The best-supported benefit is preventing diarrhea while on antibiotics. The 2019 Cochrane review by Guo and colleagues pooled 33 randomised trials with 6,352 children and found diarrhea in 8 % of those given probiotics versus 19 % of controls 5. That works out to one case prevented for every 9 children treated, on moderate-certainty evidence 5. The caveat, said out loud: the trials used many different organisms — Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Saccharomyces boulardii and others — so this is evidence for the category, not proof for any one bottle 5.

The lactic-acid mechanism carries the other plausible benefits. Lowering pH makes life hard for acid-sensitive competitors, which is the working explanation for why Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal communities go with low Nugent scores, the laboratory measure used to diagnose bacterial vaginosis 3. In food, the same acid is why fermented milk keeps. These are mechanisms with observational support; they are not the same thing as trial-proven treatment.

What it does against us

Now the part supplement labels skip. The same trick — colonise a sugar-rich pocket and pour out acid — is exactly what dissolves tooth enamel. Lactobacilli are not the bacteria that start a cavity, but once one exists they move in and drive it deeper 4.

Second, Lactobacillus can enter the bloodstream. Cannon and colleagues reviewed over 200 published cases of Lactobacillus infection, mainly endocarditis and bacteremia, and found overall mortality of nearly 30 %, with deaths concentrated in polymicrobial infections and in bacteremia that was treated inadequately 7. How rare is that? In Finland, where Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG went on sale in 1990, Salminen and colleagues found lactobacilli in 0.02 % of all blood cultures, an incidence of 0.3 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year from 1995 to 2000, and no rise as probiotic use rose 8. For a healthy person that is close to zero. For the sickest patients it is not: in 2019 Yelin and colleagues showed with whole-genome sequencing that lactobacilli in the blood of intensive-care patients were genetically inseparable from the probiotic capsules those patients had been given 9. A probiotic for an ICU patient with a central line is a medical decision, not a wellness one.

Third, the benefit does not transfer to every problem. When Schnadower and colleagues gave 971 preschool children with acute gastroenteritis either 5 days of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG or placebo across 10 US emergency departments, moderate-to-severe illness occurred in 11.8 % of the probiotic group and 12.6 % of the placebo group — no difference 6. Same organism, different disease, no effect.

How to read the label now

A strain name matters more than the genus. Lactobacillus and its new sister genera cover organisms that live in cabbage, cheese, tooth cavities and the vagina; what any one of them does is a property of the strain and the setting, not the surname. Look for the species and the strain code, look for a trial of that strain for your problem, and treat "contains Lactobacillus" the way you would treat "contains a mammal."

Key facts

  • In March 2020 the genus held 261 species; a whole-genome study reclassified them into 25 genera, 23 of them new.1
  • Lactobacilli average about 10⁶ cells per gram of human stool — roughly 0.01 % of the bacterial count — and are undetectable in around 25 % of stool samples.2
  • In 396 asymptomatic women, four of the five vaginal community types were each dominated by a single Lactobacillus species.3
  • Lactobacilli need a stagnant, low-oxygen, low-pH, sugar-rich pocket; only caries lesions, the stomach and the vagina reliably supply one.4
  • Across 33 randomised trials in 6,352 children, probiotics cut antibiotic-associated diarrhea from 19 % to 8 % — one case prevented per 9 children treated.5
  • In 971 preschool children with acute gastroenteritis, five days of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG made no difference: 11.8 % moderate-to-severe illness versus 12.6 % on placebo.6
  • In Finland, lactobacilli were found in 0.02 % of all blood cultures — 0.3 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year — with no rise as probiotic use rose.8

Questions people ask

Is Lactobacillus the same thing as a probiotic?

No. Lactobacillus is a genus — a group of related bacteria. A probiotic is a specific strain, at a specific dose, that has been tested for a specific effect. Most lactobacilli have never been tested for anything; they live in cabbage, cheese and sourdough.

Why did Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. plantarum change their names?

In 2020 genome comparisons showed the old genus was really 25 distinct genera [s1]. Host-adapted species such as L. acidophilus and L. crispatus kept the name Lactobacillus; L. rhamnosus became Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and L. plantarum became Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. The organism did not change — only its label.

Does eating yogurt put Lactobacillus in my gut?

Temporarily. Most lactobacilli found in stool are passing through from food or the mouth rather than settling in; stool counts average around 10⁶ cells per gram, about 0.01 % of the bacteria there [s2]. A small resident community exists, but yogurt does not take over your gut.

Is Lactobacillus dangerous?

For healthy people, almost never: it turns up in 0.02 % of blood cultures [s8]. For people who are critically ill, have a central line or a badly weakened immune system, it can cause bloodstream infection, and genome sequencing has traced such infections to probiotic capsules given in intensive care [s9]. In that setting it is a medical decision.

Is Lactobacillus good or bad for teeth?

Bad, once a cavity exists. Lactobacilli do not start caries, but they colonise the lesion, feed on sugar and pour out acid that deepens it; they are largely absent from the mouths of caries-free children [s4].

Sources

  1. Zheng J. et al., International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2020 — doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.004107
  2. Walter J., Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008 — doi:10.1128/AEM.00753-08
  3. Ravel J. et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011 — doi:10.1073/pnas.1002611107
  4. Caufield P.W. et al., Journal of Dental Research, 2015 — doi:10.1177/0022034515576052
  5. Guo Q. et al., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019 — doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004827.pub5
  6. Schnadower D. et al., New England Journal of Medicine, 2018 — doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1802598
  7. Cannon J.P. et al., European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2005 — doi:10.1007/s10096-004-1253-y
  8. Salminen M.K. et al., Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2002 — doi:10.1086/342912
  9. Yelin I. et al., Nature Medicine, 2019 — doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0626-9
  10. Rossi M. et al., Environmental Microbiology Reports, 2016 — doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12405

Related